| ??? 06/16/05 19:39 Read: times |
#95116 - using constant Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I use const as a double check that nothing is attempting to mess with data which it shouldnt,any problems giving a compile time error, so if the data is in a read only memory space such as code using const is a bit redundant i would have thought. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 |