| ??? 03/14/05 22:39 Read: times |
#89683 - Never mentioned multitasking Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
nope, I am saying that however complex what you are doing within 64k and 8 bits it will NOT get easier by messing it up with a URTOS. On the contrary, the more complex, the more control you need.
Again: a subroutine is NOT as "task" in the true meaning of multitasking, thus when you run ONE task on a controller why mess it up with a process intended for multitasking?. If, however, you are making something that in the correct sense of the word is multitasking (two separate non-interactive programs) then, of course, an OS is (almost) mandatory. I never mentioned using an RTOS, URTOS or any other OS. I just said a simple work loop is inadequate for complex systems because, as you say, you need more control not less. Ian |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Inserting C Code in between Assembly Lan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stop It | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank You Michael Karas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Manual | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Round Robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rounb Robin + Time Sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| round robin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How Long | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what to do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK as far as it goes. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| However | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but why make it harder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never Mention RTOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| out of hand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Never mentioned multitasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| every rule has exceptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 Banking versus External Components | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time Slicing & Apology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why RTX51? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nice quote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 'easier' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kludge | 01/01/70 00:00 |