Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/08 22:46
Read: times


 		 #151079 - isn't there some lock?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
for example, it could require the sources to be compiled/assembled by some modified/proprietary assembler with a non-compatible syntax, or some extensions, proprietary/nonstandard libraries, dontknowwhatelse...

As long as the IDE is only a crippled editor, plus a wrapper around a "normal" assembler/compiler, plus the debugger which works out of standard files format such as omf51, I see that it can be simply used for debugging only. But if I would be given a task to produce an IDE so that the user would be locked to it once he starts using it, I am quite confident I would be able to do something like what was mentioned above.

I am not saying this is the case, I am curious. I know - from this Forum - it is NOT the case with the SiLabs one; I am curious how is it with the AD.

JW




List of 42 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Initializing two timers            01/01/70 00:00      
   the infamous intel notation of hexadecimal numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
      thank you!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Aside: Assembler vs Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
      compiler vs. assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do yourself a favor ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Symptomatic?            01/01/70 00:00      
            software            01/01/70 00:00      
               bad idea            01/01/70 00:00      
               Good tools make life easier            01/01/70 00:00      
                  software choice            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I see            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Apire            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: All I know is that I hit the "Compile" button            01/01/70 00:00      
            terminology            01/01/70 00:00      
               sloppy            01/01/70 00:00      
   another question            01/01/70 00:00      
      Is it the priviledge of noobs...            01/01/70 00:00      
         follow up...            01/01/70 00:00      
            read the "bible" and FAQs            01/01/70 00:00      
               interfacing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ME=mech.engineer is fine...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     ME            01/01/70 00:00      
                     if I was not clear, then            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but does it provide the same comfort...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           so what?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Is it easy?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You answered the question yourself            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    isn't there some lock?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       actually it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                     thank you everyone!            01/01/70 00:00      
         "not bit addressable" question            01/01/70 00:00      
            Value, not SFR address            01/01/70 00:00      
               perfect!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  yes            01/01/70 00:00      
            did you check "the bible"            01/01/70 00:00      
      PWM ....            01/01/70 00:00      
         I have not see it suggested in this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
         P89V51RD2 instead of AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89V51RD2 instead of AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
   WHAT are you using            01/01/70 00:00      
      terminology            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List