Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/08 17:54
Read: times


 		 #151029 - software
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Christoph Franck said:
The software I'm using is called Aspire and it came with my Analog Devices board.

... and use something different (there should be an evaluation version of Keil uVision + C51 on the same CD). The Aspire IDE is a real kludge, and you really don't want to use their compiler (once you start programming in C instead of assembly).


Thank you for the info. I actually have a full version of IAR Embedded Workbench (opinions??) but because I'm so new to this, I've been trying to start out simple and work my way into more complicated software packages and programming. I have spent many an hour writing some complex C++ programs in Visual Studio but making the leap from computer land to real hardware is taking me some time so the simpler the better right now.

I do look forward to the day I outgrow it though!

Take care,
Brian

List of 42 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Initializing two timers            01/01/70 00:00      
   the infamous intel notation of hexadecimal numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
      thank you!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Aside: Assembler vs Compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
      compiler vs. assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do yourself a favor ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Symptomatic?            01/01/70 00:00      
            software            01/01/70 00:00      
               bad idea            01/01/70 00:00      
               Good tools make life easier            01/01/70 00:00      
                  software choice            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I see            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Apire            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: All I know is that I hit the "Compile" button            01/01/70 00:00      
            terminology            01/01/70 00:00      
               sloppy            01/01/70 00:00      
   another question            01/01/70 00:00      
      Is it the priviledge of noobs...            01/01/70 00:00      
         follow up...            01/01/70 00:00      
            read the "bible" and FAQs            01/01/70 00:00      
               interfacing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ME=mech.engineer is fine...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     ME            01/01/70 00:00      
                     if I was not clear, then            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but does it provide the same comfort...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           so what?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Is it easy?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You answered the question yourself            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    isn't there some lock?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       actually it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                     thank you everyone!            01/01/70 00:00      
         "not bit addressable" question            01/01/70 00:00      
            Value, not SFR address            01/01/70 00:00      
               perfect!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  yes            01/01/70 00:00      
            did you check "the bible"            01/01/70 00:00      
      PWM ....            01/01/70 00:00      
         I have not see it suggested in this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
         P89V51RD2 instead of AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89V51RD2 instead of AT89S52            01/01/70 00:00      
   WHAT are you using            01/01/70 00:00      
      terminology            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List