Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/15/07 14:39
Read: times


 
#147018 - No - that is still a really bad idea!
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Shehryar Shaukat said:
I meant to say that my internal RAM is filled up . my 32k external RAM is not running out of memory. so i am planning to use the _at_ keyword to define variables in the expanded ram.

You didn't use _at_ for the internal XDATA, so why would you think that's the way to use the external XDATA?!

You need to configure the tools to match your target system and, thus, make use of all its resources!

if i use xdata with external ram switched off( through AUXR ) than would i be using the Expanded RAM ( 768 bytes in my case) ?

Remember, XDATA is anything and everything that's accessed via the MOVX instructions - as far as the CPU is concerned, it is totally unaware whether the actual memory is physically inside or outside the chip.

You will have to read the chip's Datasheet to see what happens when both internal and external memory are present...

I dont have a clue about configuring the KEIL Uvision 2,

You don't have to use uVision - you can do it all via the command line, if you prefer.
Or via some other, 3rd-party tool.

But, whatever you do, you simply must understand the tools that you are using!

This is not a trivial project, and you are up against resource limitations - you cannot afford to be using your tools sub-optimally, and you cannot hope to use them optimally without thoroughly understanding them!

are you talking setting the memory model.

No, I'm talking about configuring the tools so that they will use your available 32K of XDATA RAM

i am googling about data overlaying.

You don't need google - this is Keil-specific, so you just need to read your Manuals and do some searching in the Keil Application Notes & Knowledgebase.


List of 119 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
USING EXTERNAL RAM AS CODE MEMORY            01/01/70 00:00      
   no need            01/01/70 00:00      
      MMC ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Let him do what he wants!            01/01/70 00:00      
            did I say not to?            01/01/70 00:00      
            how to?            01/01/70 00:00      
               But how?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  well,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     end of wrong stick!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        already stated            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I see            01/01/70 00:00      
   How will you load the RAM?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I agree with some here            01/01/70 00:00      
      What's pretty handy is BBRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
         True, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      double-post ... sorry!            01/01/70 00:00      
      A little tidy-up            01/01/70 00:00      
         there is a way ... in fact, several ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            and appears to have lost interest            01/01/70 00:00      
               APOLOGIES AND CLARIFICATION            01/01/70 00:00      
                  answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why 32K?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Erik's Answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                     FURTHER HELP NEEDED.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Yes, of course!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           the Basics implementation            01/01/70 00:00      
                              TC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Please explain            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Binary executable format?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Still not got it!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       order of intel hex file            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          records in Intel Hex file not necessarily in order            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             YES THE RECORDS ARE NOT IN SEQUENCE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Not strange at all            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Good question...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Binary executable            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I don't think you were            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Elaboration requested.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             GOT it, no elaboration required            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             That's it            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm sorry, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                        .            01/01/70 00:00      
                           here is a link to a free 8051 assembler.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Pardon?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I didnt mean it that way.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Still lost            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I HAVE TO DEAL WITH HEX CODE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Additionaly            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Duplicate post!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Some comments            01/01/70 00:00      
         I'm using simple terms            01/01/70 00:00      
            @ Mike Stegaier            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not true            01/01/70 00:00      
               FLASH ROM and EEPROM            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Literal or idiomatic            01/01/70 00:00      
                     here's why            01/01/70 00:00      
                        .            01/01/70 00:00      
                           oh yes, it is            01/01/70 00:00      
                              ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   double post, please ignore            01/01/70 00:00      
   KISS            01/01/70 00:00      
   Similar project            01/01/70 00:00      
   Additionaly            01/01/70 00:00      
      You really need to study some basics first!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Apology            01/01/70 00:00      
      Make it simple...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dynamic linking            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not on an 8051!            01/01/70 00:00      
         But i have to find a way            01/01/70 00:00      
            Bootloader            01/01/70 00:00      
            tri-processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
            You are where you are            01/01/70 00:00      
               Brand new product            01/01/70 00:00      
         There may be a way out after all ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I don't think so?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Processor Not my choice            01/01/70 00:00      
   How to use external EEPROM AT24C16A with P89C51RD2            01/01/70 00:00      
   ANDY is right jerson but Thanks :)            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thinking laterally            01/01/70 00:00      
         good idea!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Some sort of P-Code Interpreter            01/01/70 00:00      
   Comments            01/01/70 00:00      
      Really Bad idea!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Misunderstanding            01/01/70 00:00      
            why, oh why?            01/01/70 00:00      
            No - that is still a really bad idea!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Is it Still a bad idea????????            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Use the Linker            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Got it Andy.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Summary needed            01/01/70 00:00      
         Required Summary            01/01/70 00:00      
            somethingt does not jive            01/01/70 00:00      
            something else does not jive            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes i have 3 processors            01/01/70 00:00      
            Why only 32K            01/01/70 00:00      
               32k is fine but do suggest some IC's            01/01/70 00:00      
                  -2 for help?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Still don't get it!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  don't be silly            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks ERIC!!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
      comments            01/01/70 00:00      
         What a revelation, I bet most did not know that            01/01/70 00:00      
         ???            01/01/70 00:00      
            THANKS ANDY, you are a real CHUM            01/01/70 00:00      
            my explanation            01/01/70 00:00      
               who on earth, in his right mind ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               You need to think more carefully before you write            01/01/70 00:00      
         Data compression, point taken            01/01/70 00:00      
   CHECKSUM COMPLETED            01/01/70 00:00      
      Time for a new thread?            01/01/70 00:00      
   CONTROLLER SPEEDS/ MISMATCH CRYSTAL??????            01/01/70 00:00      
      Don't ignore the datasheet!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Through a pin/bit complementing program            01/01/70 00:00      
            who gives a hoot            01/01/70 00:00      
            Obviously will be less than the crystal frequency!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Only Complement instruction            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Complement Only?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Can't be just a single instruction!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        GOT THE POINT.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List