| ??? 04/26/07 14:07 Read: times |
#138025 - if it does, then you need to KISS Responding to: ???'s previous message |
+ I have an additional high priority interrupt that can override the serial interrupt (receiving through radio) so it causes the same effect as my scheduller solution, insert a gap between transmitting bytes
If it does, then you need to KISS. If the execution time of your high priority interrupt (there went the possibility to read serial in a 'task') is a millisecond or more, you will have FAR GREATER problems than serial send and receive. Erik KISS: Keep ISRs Short and Simple |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Serial transmission in scheduller instead of int | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| danger, maybe, loss of efficiency YES ABSOLUTELY!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| avoiding interrupts means... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scheduller.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| there is no such thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitation API | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| API? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes ASIC design fixed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| debug possibilities? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Monitor is nice idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1ms vs 1.04ms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely NOT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok but 1 byte is transmitted together | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if it does, then you need to KISS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I took the 1ms processing tick for granted... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks for the inputs... | 01/01/70 00:00 |