Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/26/07 13:50
Read: times


 
#138016 - Scheduller....
Responding to: ???'s previous message
...I need because I have to do things that should happen separate from the application (i.e. special processing and radio transmission like repeating).

And these things HAVE to run paralel. I really can't see any other option as doing some kind of cooperative tasks with the help of timer.

+the whole implementation is stucked into an API so the scheduller is running there, without any knowledge what the mighty application is doing.

And I pray that '51 architecture can live with it. Have no other options it's the core of an ASIC, and trust me it was not my decission to use it (although I like this micro very much).

Anyway if Keil managed to do an RTOS with scheduller for '51, why wouldn't it work for me if I build one (without preemtion, context switch etc.)?

To Jan:
p.s. Slovak beer is good enough for me, but I decided, why not to learn German :)

And yeah unfortunately I had to leave C and dive into ASM after realising the fact that a C compiler lives his own life and it must not always be in a way I want. So any asm vs C commentars are welcome.


List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Serial transmission in scheduller instead of int            01/01/70 00:00      
   danger, maybe, loss of efficiency YES ABSOLUTELY!!            01/01/70 00:00      
      avoiding interrupts means...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Scheduller....            01/01/70 00:00      
         there is no such thing            01/01/70 00:00      
            Limitation API            01/01/70 00:00      
               API?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes ASIC design fixed...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     debug possibilities?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Monitor is nice idea            01/01/70 00:00      
   1ms vs 1.04ms            01/01/70 00:00      
      absolutely NOT            01/01/70 00:00      
         ok but 1 byte is transmitted together            01/01/70 00:00      
            if it does, then you need to KISS            01/01/70 00:00      
         I took the 1ms processing tick for granted...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thanks for the inputs...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List