Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/17/07 12:39
Modified:
  04/17/07 12:40
Read: times


 		 #137368 - and both were stated
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It's simpler because it makes two simplifying assumptions

which both apply in the case discussed here.

Both "simplifying assumptions" were stated. Of course, if the dserivative is non-traditional, your formula is the only one useable (unless you modify mine to fit), but for the traditional '51 it holds, even if you use T2, the same formula can be used if divide by a constant is added.

Erik



List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
11.0592Mhz xtal and 56K - challenging            01/01/70 00:00      
   Character interrupts are not every machine cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
      Well done!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM            01/01/70 00:00      
      I must have RTWFM            01/01/70 00:00      
         for the edification of others            01/01/70 00:00      
            the link            01/01/70 00:00      
               this?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Deja vu?            01/01/70 00:00      
      now you are telling me!            01/01/70 00:00      
         when referring to tomes            01/01/70 00:00      
            my manuals            01/01/70 00:00      
               Confirmation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  10 or 11 bit times?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     sometimes            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Are you sure,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Me too!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No It is me            01/01/70 00:00      
         You are putting the cart before the horse            01/01/70 00:00      
            that works, this does too (and, in my opinion) is            01/01/70 00:00      
               less general is always simpler!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  and both were stated            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I dont use T1            01/01/70 00:00      
                        sure but what does that have to do with it?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Every machine cycle...            01/01/70 00:00      
      not quite            01/01/70 00:00      
         I shoul have said "in your case..."            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List