Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/17/07 12:10
Read: times


 		 #137366 - that works, this does too (and, in my opinion) is
Responding to: ???'s previous message
But it's probably easier to just stick with the time between characters (which is known directly from the baud rate) and work out the equivalent number of machine cycles from there

that works, this does too (and, in my opinion, is easier.

the number of instruction cycles allowed to process a character from the UART for a traditional '51 using T1 is:
((256 - T1 reload) * 160)/(1 + SMOD)

Erik

List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
11.0592Mhz xtal and 56K - challenging            01/01/70 00:00      
   Character interrupts are not every machine cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
      Well done!            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM            01/01/70 00:00      
      I must have RTWFM            01/01/70 00:00      
         for the edification of others            01/01/70 00:00      
            the link            01/01/70 00:00      
               this?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Deja vu?            01/01/70 00:00      
      now you are telling me!            01/01/70 00:00      
         when referring to tomes            01/01/70 00:00      
            my manuals            01/01/70 00:00      
               Confirmation?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  10 or 11 bit times?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     sometimes            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Are you sure,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Me too!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No It is me            01/01/70 00:00      
         You are putting the cart before the horse            01/01/70 00:00      
            that works, this does too (and, in my opinion) is            01/01/70 00:00      
               less general is always simpler!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  and both were stated            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I dont use T1            01/01/70 00:00      
                        sure but what does that have to do with it?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Every machine cycle...            01/01/70 00:00      
      not quite            01/01/70 00:00      
         I shoul have said "in your case..."            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List