| ??? 05/10/06 12:28 Read: times |
#115929 - Basic methods & specific details Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Batuhan Celik said:
I have the basic programming methodes. It does not depend on any micro controller or PC programming language. But when it comes to the details of a particular microcontroller - such as interrupts and specific peripherals, ports, etc - It does matter very much indeed! The concept of interrupts seems to be a stumbling block for you: the general principles are fairly common amongst different processors (even the x86 in a PC), but you do need to pay attention to the specific details for each particular processor! Also, the 'C' programming language knows nothing about interrupts - so anything in any particular compiler to do with interrupts will always be an extension specific to that compiler. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I'm in trouble with my PWM software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupts ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Firstly I want to explain how my hardwar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use a uC with a PCA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wiggling with the stack pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know that.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no you don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can't tell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| His Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nicely formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As Erik suggested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not valuable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hard to understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asking for? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Weird DNA.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that does make a difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Playing with The Stack Pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ORG 33H | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| replying to what in the above refer to m | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Listen and learn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excellent question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm listening and learning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rewrite ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WRONG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic methods & specific details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To:Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| +ve&-ve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| totally unnneded information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| +ve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| halfway | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just like the first time I saw 3v3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mid 70's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes - Very Well Established | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the trouble is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other calls | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One thing for the future | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not see the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I got bored... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| argh, so many nops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Steve...and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I suggest you look at your own changes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| His new code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very informative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another happy customer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Young Double E? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| finished | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the one at which end of the body? | 01/01/70 00:00 |