| ??? 05/09/06 21:01 Read: times |
#115891 - Thanks Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"I can't tell - especiially it is difficult when I have to accept that you do not have the ability to write "+ve and -ve" fully. "
That was really one of the silly defending tactics. But ı think you can tell me whether you are an engineer or literature teacher.(just share your technical knowledge if you want to help somebody and if you can) AND RESPECT OHTERS <DO NOT 'tell me' that what your first link require is "not infected" I will not believe your certainty> You may not believe my certainty. It depends on you! But I have got to say that ı need help and I don't have an evil intention! "there is no interrupt at 33h in a 80c51" As far as I know that is true There is no interrupt at 33h in 80C51 I'm using 89C82and it has interupt vectors at 2Bh, 23h, 1Bh, 13h(used), 0Bh, 03h(used) , 00h(reset) Please explain what did you want to emphasize. "Its pretty hard to follow what you are doing. Are you sure you can't eliminate the messy NOPS" I have to use those nop operations. Because I'm driving 600V 15A IGBT through optocouplers. And IGBTs need aproximately 3 microseconds falling and rising time. "You don't seem tohave grasped what is happening in an interrupt service request - once the interrupt has happened the program goes back whereever it started from." In my one of the previous messages I have written an explanation about what you wanted to say.And thanks for your warning. "You say you are a beginner, but are tring an advanced method." Yes I'm beginner but I have necessary programming tactics.I'm an egineering faculty student. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| I'm in trouble with my PWM software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupts ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Firstly I want to explain how my hardwar | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| use a uC with a PCA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wiggling with the stack pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know that.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no you don't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To: Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can't tell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| His Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nicely formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As Erik suggested | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not valuable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hard to understand | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| asking for? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Weird DNA.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that does make a difference | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Playing with The Stack Pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ORG 33H | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| replying to what in the above refer to m | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Listen and learn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excellent question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm listening and learning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rewrite ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WRONG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Basic methods & specific details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To:Neil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| +ve&-ve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| totally unnneded information | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| +ve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| halfway | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just like the first time I saw 3v3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mid 70's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes - Very Well Established | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the trouble is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Other calls | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One thing for the future | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not see the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I got bored... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| argh, so many nops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New version | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Steve...and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I suggest you look at your own changes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| His new code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very informative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another happy customer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Young Double E? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| finished | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the one at which end of the body? | 01/01/70 00:00 |