| ??? 05/03/06 17:44 Read: times |
#115498 - not exactly that ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What I meant was that, in light of Cyrille's original posting regarding memory decoding, some time back, it's clear that his situation is different from that of most persons posting here. He's inclined to ask questions of a somewhat more general, in some cases meaning NOT necessarily 805x-specific, nature, due to the scarcity of information in his locale, and due to the limitations his level of English imposes.
I actually can't at this moment, think of a case in which decrementing a value of zero will yield much other than 0xFF, aside, perhaps, from a CPU that allows for decimal mode operations. RE |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| DEC 0H ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| dec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How you figure its memory location zero? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Because | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assumption... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think of it like a clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i think it's bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ASSUME = ASS U ME read and head. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but the answer will still be in "the bib | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's in the title! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rely on history | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exceptions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not exactly that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DEC R6 ! (8051 chip) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the description of the DEC instruction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good! Erick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why work from print | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surely that's justification enough. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did not suggest that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I did not suggest that ! .... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about an ordometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| control apps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In decimal mode ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |