??? 03/08/06 14:41 Read: times |
#111606 - to Jon Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I just had a look at the section "level converters"
Could/should you, with your words, add "the means of avoiding a MAX232(equivalent) claimed to be functional, tested and good are pure crap" This male cow defecation keeps popping up. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Using AT89C2051 UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No pull up needed. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
buffer/driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Slower Baud Rate. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what good would that do? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the fact is that with proper design (and![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to Jon | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yep | 01/01/70 00:00 |