??? 03/08/06 13:07 Read: times |
#111597 - what good would that do? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Try it at a slow baud rate, Also make sure your crystal is the same . if it works at a slow baud rate consider redoing your serial circuit for noise problems.
what good would that do? If Sajeevan has a proper MAX232(equivalent) and a proper crystal none of the above will do anything. If he does WHAT "noise problems" ?. Of course if he read and believed one of these false postulates "here is a circuit to avoid the need for a RS232 transciever" he is screwed anyway. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Using AT89C2051 UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No pull up needed. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
buffer/driver | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Slower Baud Rate. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what good would that do? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
True. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the fact is that with proper design (and![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Check this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to Jon | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yep | 01/01/70 00:00 |