| ??? 03/07/06 18:22 Read: times |
#111545 - True but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What you said is true, but you need to check the functioning of a circuit thorougly for the first time it is developed. And I am sure even if the theory behind a design is solid, you tend to reasure yourself by checking thoroughly and in different conditions, specially after you have seen so many bugs in the past. That is what I meant. And for me it was the first kind of a solo-mini project.
Cheers, Jack. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Analog Comparator on 89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator on AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Bert! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| appnote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one misapplication, one addition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks to all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hobby project? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Active - hummmm.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advise needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you seen the appnotes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes I have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P3.6??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally working, maybe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surely working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consistency, HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not technically correct! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, it is "testing" which is worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, I do not do as above. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"solid theories" vs "testing" | 01/01/70 00:00 |