| ??? 03/07/06 18:04 Modified: 03/07/06 18:05 Read: times |
#111538 - so, it is "testing" which is worthless Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I got the intended results repeatedly for the same resistance, thats all.
all "testing" proves is that the unit worked till it was turned off. I can not count the number of "succesfully tested" things I have had to fix. The only way to "check out the consistency of the design" is to verify the design. If the design and the theory behind it is solid, then you only need to test ONCE. If you need to test repeatedly, that indicates that you are not sure of your design. Go over your design, verify it and the basis of it, then you have "verified the consistency of the design". Erik succesful testing does not prove the abscence of bugs, it proves the abscence of known bugs |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Analog Comparator on 89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator on AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Bert! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| appnote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one misapplication, one addition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks to all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hobby project? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Active - hummmm.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advise needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you seen the appnotes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes I have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P3.6??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally working, maybe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surely working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consistency, HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not technically correct! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, it is "testing" which is worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, I do not do as above. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"solid theories" vs "testing" | 01/01/70 00:00 |