| ??? 02/24/06 20:23 Read: times |
#110723 - hobby project? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jack Key said:
[...] actually I am a software designer and have worked on 89S8252, Cygnal C8051F064 and am currently working on LPC2132(ARM). But have never had to deal with much of hardware. But now I am trying to give hardware a try. What better than a small chip like 89C2051. Hmm, sounds like a half step backwards. The AT89C2051 is not the most practical chip for hobbying. I'd suggest something ISP-able - see the chips you've been working before, or try to have a look at the RD2 sub-family (AT89C51ED2/RD2/others; P89V51RD2). JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Analog Comparator on 89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator on AT89C2051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Bert! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ADC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog comparator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| appnote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one misapplication, one addition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks to all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Printable ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hobby project? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Active - hummmm.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Advise needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Have you seen the appnotes? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes I have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P3.6??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Finally working, maybe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Surely working! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| consistency, HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not technically correct! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so, it is "testing" which is worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| True but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, I do not do as above. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"solid theories" vs "testing" | 01/01/70 00:00 |