Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/01/06 17:16
Read: times


 
#110994 - Math?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Assuming your code to make the 10 bytes takes longer that 1 byte transmission time:

Keil C 9 waits.
You 10 waits.

besides you can moify the Keil Code, just make a copy to your project.
They give you putchar() because all the other C printing code uses it. If you wanted to print to an LCD, you just change the one function. I your case you may not want to use it.

List of 24 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
putchar C51 serial communication problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   Keil putchar source            01/01/70 00:00      
   putchar() reworded            01/01/70 00:00      
      TI            01/01/70 00:00      
         thanks and here is my C code of asm...            01/01/70 00:00      
            should be obvious            01/01/70 00:00      
               To be fair            01/01/70 00:00      
            C gives higher performance!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Initial conditions            01/01/70 00:00      
                  waiting better than uninten effcy            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Better?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Math?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     What?????            01/01/70 00:00      
                        no work to do unitl bytes send            01/01/70 00:00      
   OK            01/01/70 00:00      
      or...            01/01/70 00:00      
         That is better            01/01/70 00:00      
            i read about putchar()            01/01/70 00:00      
               Try \Keil\C51\LIB\getkey.c            01/01/70 00:00      
               Keil Library Source Files            01/01/70 00:00      
                  ok            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No and Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but what about AT cmd            01/01/70 00:00      
                           No            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List