| ??? 02/28/06 17:54 Read: times |
#110929 - To be fair Responding to: ???'s previous message |
This one has bitten me in the behind once, too. I wasn't too pleased with it at the time:
http://www.raisonance.com/Forum/pho...=652&t=652 But at least I could agree with the reasoning behind it (eventually). Rob. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| putchar C51 serial communication problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil putchar source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| putchar() reworded | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks and here is my C code of asm... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| should be obvious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To be fair | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C gives higher performance! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initial conditions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| waiting better than uninten effcy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Better? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Math? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no work to do unitl bytes send | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i read about putchar() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try \Keil\C51\LIB\getkey.c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil Library Source Files | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No and Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but what about AT cmd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No | 01/01/70 00:00 |