| ??? 02/25/06 10:40 Read: times |
#110771 - Sorry, but you are O.T. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
@Stefan,
if I read the first post I understand only, that he assume, that the lock bits are not working. Never was stated, that he want something other than only setting the lock bits and verify, that further reading generate rubbish. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| HOW TO PROTECT SOFTWARE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| When asking questions like yours ALWAYS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Erik & Jack. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By using a programmer which supports... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reading correct ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe all he wants is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you propose to do this as a condi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two answers ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the weekness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HOW TO PROTECT SOFTWARE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re crypting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where ther is a will, there is a way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the "simple" "encryption" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another example : smartcards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry, but you are O.T. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what ????????????????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stop misusing this forum! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where are you Jog Milind? | 01/01/70 00:00 |