| ??? 02/24/06 19:12 Modified: 02/24/06 19:56 Read: times |
#110717 - re: eric Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik I agree with you, your´re absolutly right!
I did´nt explained the methode I used 16 Years deeply detailed but it should be clear that a input would be translated to a output. There was no "random crypting" used .. sure it´s outdated ... about 16 Years have past by... When I´m looking back to that Days there is a big smile in my face :-) I agree with you completly ! Nothing is "unhackable" In that case of good crypting there is allways a way to emulate something. My Posting was only Posted to get Mr. Jog Milind´s Brain working and find out something else... Cheers Stefan |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| HOW TO PROTECT SOFTWARE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| When asking questions like yours ALWAYS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree with Erik & Jack. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| By using a programmer which supports... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reading correct ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe all he wants is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How do you propose to do this as a condi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Two answers ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the weekness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HOW TO PROTECT SOFTWARE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re crypting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: eric | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| where ther is a will, there is a way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the "simple" "encryption" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another example : smartcards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry, but you are O.T. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what ????????????????? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stop misusing this forum! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where are you Jog Milind? | 01/01/70 00:00 |