| ??? 01/05/06 17:39 Read: times |
#106604 - Ah but.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mahmood Elnasser said:
I wrote this last night when I was in bed half a sleep. Must be my unconcious mind. Worked beautifully. ii and var are declared but omitted because they give a hint. ii is declared and initialised in the for loop. No problem with that. There is no way anyone can reasonably work out what this code is supposed to do if we do not know the initial value of var. Ian |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Weekend Puzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| symmetry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no printf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dont' know but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't be fast on the trigger please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| var | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can't answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oddometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well Done !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simple but slow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still simple, but faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No fun at all. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32-bit / 10-digit conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Big Display | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that is not good enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Even my old eyes could see that! n/t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ideas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimisation and comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| decimal unpacker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a quick look reveal that it seems to be | 01/01/70 00:00 |