| ??? 01/05/06 17:08 Read: times |
#106598 - symmetry Responding to: ???'s previous message |
For sake of symmetry, I'd suggest you to consider ++xx[4] instead of xx[4]++ ...
And where is the printf? :-) Jan Waclawek PS: I don't C... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Weekend Puzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| symmetry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no printf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dont' know but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't be fast on the trigger please | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah but.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| var | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can't answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oddometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well Done !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simple but slow | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still simple, but faster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No fun at all. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 32-bit / 10-digit conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Big Display | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if that is not good enough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Even my old eyes could see that! n/t | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ideas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Optimisation and comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Puzzle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| decimal unpacker | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a quick look reveal that it seems to be | 01/01/70 00:00 |