??? 12/31/05 16:36 Read: times |
#106282 - Now I understand what you mean... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kevin said:
Since there are only three connections to each tri-state buffer, where is the connection to the bottom buffer coming from? Or instead, is this just a 'continuation' of the connection from the top buffer? This kind of drawing only tells, that all the involved /G-inputs are connected together! Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
ds89c420 programmer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now I understand what you mean... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
so, I'm correct? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, you are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not to beat a dead horse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Much more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
given | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DS89C420 ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
isp response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
External access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
caps for crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only NP0 ceramics! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
over my head | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NP0, X7R, Z5U | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
digikey will be my friend | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Everybody probably already knows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Overlapping standards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
holy moly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh dear...! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
now you're playing me right? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes really ;) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one more thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
max232 charge caps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a good reference for this . . . | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thx | 01/01/70 00:00 |