??? 12/22/05 10:07 Read: times |
#105724 - I know Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes, I have very limited range of addresses, say 10 slaves maximum.
Reduction of timeout to 10ms did not solve the problem. As you said the master is still waiting for ACK or the next bit of a incomplete byte of data, when the addressed slave is disconnected. But I dont know how to stop master from useless waiting. Thanks for your help. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Plug & play by I2C ,is it possibe? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You have two problems? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
with a "master" with IIC hardware it sho | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
lot of time not needed ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
limited feasibility of I2C PnP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the fact is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: the facts is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CAN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unkowm state | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I must try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Inappropriate Design Choice? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hot-swap I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a fvew points | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ACCESS.bus is PnP I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just recalled![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |