| ??? 09/05/10 19:39 Read: times |
#178455 - 1.6mm in new money... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... (or thicker) would be best for the copper tape experiments;
thinner would be fine for the "insulating backplates". Steve M. Taylor said: 1/16 or thinner ? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Plain (unclad) PCB laminate material? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unclad substrate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If all you need is material.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FR4 without copper | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS Components also sells sheets of various plastics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But have you seen their prices?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Environment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Religious?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More holey than righteous | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| substrate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How much ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| apologies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No offence! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FR4 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1.6mm in new money... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "laying up" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why does it have to be PCB laminate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Required by Application No 2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I have used and done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Scroll down | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Where? | 01/01/70 00:00 |