| ??? 03/23/10 19:06 Read: times  | 
#174445 - Xilinx Responding to: ???'s previous message  | 
Oliver Sedlacek said: 
Bearing in mind that they are trying to impress potential users, why are they often fairly crap. Of particular note I'm annoyed by:
 Code examples that don't build Poor coding standards Changing the installation locations breaks things The breadboard area jst has a bunch of through holes Is it me? Not just you. Xilinx eval/starter kits have notoriously shitty code, with lots of stuff simply missing. I opened a web case once: "Can you supply the source code for the default program that ships with this particular kit?" and I was told that it was not available. -a  | 



