| ??? 04/04/06 07:16 Modified: 04/04/06 07:23 Read: times | #113594 - Too many black box simulators Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| Unfortunatly there is a lack of simulators which are cycle acurate for any given cpu.At present I have kind of got around the problem by the use of a TCL front end for a 8052 VHDL model running in a testbench in modelsim.Its slow and clunky BUT it is accurate down to individual clock cycles and you can see all the data transfers rather than just being presented with a black box where you have no idea where the data transfers occur during each machine cycle.Until someone writes a simulator which accuratly models the register transfers on a cycle by cycle basis its the only way to get an accurate simulation. | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| new free 8052 emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're willing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jump from emulator to model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We had 'em with HILO in '86 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sub-clock emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, to some extent you need to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthlessness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, I'll rephrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Windoze only? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross-platform | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd guess he wanted to avoid that term | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator vs emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, then it is a simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reinventing the wheel is fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds good to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too many black box simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've got to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0.6 and stuff   | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



