| ??? 03/25/06 21:57 Read: times |
#113087 - emulation details Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm not planning to emulate what things happen inside one processor cycle (i.e. inside the 12 clocks of the original '51), as I feel that is largely unneccessary for the scope of the project. It wouldn't be impossible, but would add a lot of largely unneccessary complexity in the architecture.
I am planning on supporting timers etc, and SFR reads and writes are already implemented as callbacks, so the emulator is pretty extensible. If I have the time, I'll add emulation of several '51 variants. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| new free 8052 emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're willing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jump from emulator to model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We had 'em with HILO in '86 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sub-clock emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, to some extent you need to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthlessness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, I'll rephrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Windoze only? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross-platform | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd guess he wanted to avoid that term | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator vs emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, then it is a simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reinventing the wheel is fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds good to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too many black box simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've got to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
0.6 and stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 |