| ??? 03/26/06 17:47 Read: times | #113142 - well, then it is a simulator Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| I've never actually considered the concept of a hardware emulator =) As a programmer, to me, that's already the "real thing".
 If that is what you "think" then why reinvent the wheel, just use the keil simulator. An emulator allow you torun the thingy" a simulator simulates the run of the thingy. How do you propose to "emulate" a deviuce with keypad, display UART which all require precise timing and signal levels within specs. Erik | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| new free 8052 emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're willing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jump from emulator to model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We had 'em with HILO in '86 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sub-clock emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, to some extent you need to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthlessness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, I'll rephrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Windoze only? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross-platform | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd guess he wanted to avoid that term | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator vs emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, then it is a simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reinventing the wheel is fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds good to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too many black box simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've got to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 0.6 and stuff   | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



