| ??? 03/09/06 15:15 Read: times |
#111730 - Correct by construction Responding to: ???'s previous message |
After reading the article I followed some of the links. Does anyone here use 'correct by construction'? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| i suggest you read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flawed article | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| men only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you don;'t know Jack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you want a laugh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tar with the same brush | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i dont think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| grades??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Snobbery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re grades | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Graduates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Value of Education | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is sad, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cost of Education | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gonna get a PhD, or a lobotomy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lobotomy? do you like the idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just to clerify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm glad you said that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Likewise ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct by construction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i do, follow much of it | 01/01/70 00:00 |