| ??? 06/09/99 18:46 Read: times |
#490 - RE: CLOCK |
Peter Dannegger wrote: ------------------------------- >if I can all do inside my AT89C4051, why I should spend additional pcb >space and cost to use an external RTC ? Assuming you don't need external RAM OK, but I need external and backed RAM >Then I lose also the chance to correct deviation in software >without an instable trimmed capacitor. >Also my software RTC can serve calculation of weekday >and daylight saving. Doesn't change the clever tricks in software ! but saves interrupt handling when you are really time critical. OK if you are building a clock use software, but what about when you are in a high speed problem ?> >Most RTC are not easy to read and set (4-bit BCD coded, >very particular serial protocol) , so no significant code >space and CPU time saved. Code is pretty easy really. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: CLOCK | 01/01/70 00:00 |



