| ??? 02/18/08 08:38 Read: times |
#150992 - Yes, of course - but in assembler? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
you merely need to follow the procedures defined in the file systems specification, and there's not that much difference between doing it on a 16 bit uC or an 8 bit (or 32 bit) uC. In fact, no difference at all! The file system is entirely unaware of what type of system it is connected to - it works the way it works, irrespective of what you use to drive it! So long as your system abides by the specifications, it will work. See also: http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=147839 But the next question is: is this really a suitable application for assembler? You are likely to find that file systems make extensive use of 16-bit and larger data types - which will make a lot more work to code in assembler on an 8-bit controller... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| File Handling using 8 bit Uc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Of course it's possible ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, of course - but in assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why mess? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FAT in assembly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How did FAT come up? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FATs popularity is largely given by... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Craig cited it as an example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I disagree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asm vs. C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| registers??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Difference is... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actually, that was me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're not determined to use FAT12 or 16 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Conclusion? | 01/01/70 00:00 |