| ??? 10/04/07 17:29 Read: times |
#145405 - No, that's not it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Yes, if one manufacturer or another would actually admit that there's a basic problem with the RESET scheme on the 805x core, then everyone could stop denying it.
If it is your intention to make te guy/gal 'admit' then I'll call the whole thing off. I will not "pull strings" to get you someone to bash!!! My hope is that we will get an explanation of how static reset works, if that turns out to show that some problem exist, it is not to make the manufacturer "admit crap" but to get a handle on how to circumvent it. Erik What would be helpful would be to know the "whole truth" about the effect of 805x RESET under rising and falling Vcc. Getting them to "admit" to an untruth would be counterproductive. If they can tell the 805x user community exactly how to avoid any sort of mishap with respect to RESET, and avoid impacting internal or external resources of any kind, 99.999% of the time, then the problem will be handled within short order. Under the present conditions, I'm presuaded that a regulator with a shutdown and a cheap mosfet to discharge Vcc when the regulator is in shudown would do the job. It may be simpler than that of course, but that's cheap enough. RE |



