| ??? 10/08/06 21:27 Read: times |
#126019 - Thanks but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Dear Dr.Jan Waclawek,
I thank you for your time and well thought of comment "I'd expect a combination of hardware running "on the edge" and the possibly faster edges of signals of the AT89Sxx." But I could not assimilate "issues like these are impossible to solve without having the actual hardware and software on hand".What are the issues like this?Fortunately I have many problems yet to be solved and I can (read,would love to) take any trouble to get your expert opinions and guidance;what about the topic "8051 phase control of triacs for (medium) inductive load and redundancy of MOC3021 in transformerless power supply".Shall I start a new thread?Can you spare some time? With best regards A.S.Rudra |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| New problem with AT89S52,not AT89C52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| flash corruption? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Verified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| faster? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just because 'it worked' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| schematics | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one more at "that school" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Please start a new thread! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nobody in their right mind | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| check diffs? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A boon in disguise | 01/01/70 00:00 |