??? 09/24/06 00:06 Read: times |
#124936 - Another vote for Keil Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Eric,
I'll join Russ in casting another vote for Keil. I've been programming since the days when Fortran was king and people who didn't know any better thought COBOL was worth learning. My point is that I've written far more code without an IDE than with, yet I am one of those who will stick with Keil precisely because it has such a robust and thourough IDE. I especially like Keil's simulation capability. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Compiling for the 8051 Arch. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 Compilers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
In what way do you go aground? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sdcc + mide | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
block diagram of 80c51 microcontroler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is in the datasheet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... or the so-called bible![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Can't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another vote for Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'll also vote for Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or Raisonance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re Keil and Raisonance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actualy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Going with IAR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
boguous atmel header files, include compiler.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IAR changed from v5 to v6 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How very thoughtful of them! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tools available | 01/01/70 00:00 |