| ??? 05/14/06 17:26 Read: times |
#116187 - single chip solutions Responding to: ???'s previous message |
About 10 years ago I tried similar things.
But today I use only 8051 derivates with internal flash and bootloader, e.g. AT89C51ED2, AT89C51CC03, P89C668, C8051F120 and so on. So I never needed to store code into external SRAM. Also I'm happy, that no 18 portpins must be reserved for SRAM and be fully usable by the application. Peter |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| interrupt table copy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| optimisation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes i had that in mind but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No P2 worries | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thanks for making this clear! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| single chip solutions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ofcourse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why does it need optimising? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you sure this is OK? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| THANKS! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| >256 byte long table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll give it a go... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worked! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: >256 byte long table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not quite this issue | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
issue resolved | 01/01/70 00:00 |