??? 04/28/06 14:34 Read: times |
#115169 - Take it literally Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Anton Heard said:
Is it possible you can tell me in a little more detail? What detail is there to add? The terms mean exactly what they say: Stuck At 1: The signal is stuck (ie, fixed; never moves) at the logic '1' state - it never changes, no matter what the inputs may be. The Truth Table for such an output could be: Inputs | A B | Output -------+------- X X | 1 Stuck At 0: The signal is stuck (ie, fixed; never moves) at the logic '0' state - it never changes, no matter what the inputs may be.: Inputs | A B | Output -------+------- X X | 0 |
Topic | Author | Date |
ASM Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
show us your thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Software Design Description SDD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keypad - or DIP switch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no such thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
opps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good for you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well, Can I Do This! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
without some selection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is a start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh, hoiw often do we see someone believi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That or it is just Obvious to them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and why should they assume it is to us | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well - careful - yes, definitely with as | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit Cellar Built one about 1986 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe this will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why guessing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also...stuck at 1 and stuck at 0 faults | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Take it literally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:RE:![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |