??? 04/23/06 15:52 Read: times |
#114800 - two ways Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I suppose you could either try to determine the chip function and test it without knowing what part has been plugged in which is pretty tricky, or you can have some sort of selector to select the device type and that easier because you just have to apply the test vectors and check the outputs. |
Topic | Author | Date |
ASM Language | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
show us your thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Software Design Description SDD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTFM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
two ways | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE; | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keypad - or DIP switch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BCD | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no such thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
opps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good for you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well, Can I Do This! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your program | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
without some selection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is a start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oh, hoiw often do we see someone believi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That or it is just Obvious to them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and why should they assume it is to us | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SMS ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well - careful - yes, definitely with as | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Circuit Cellar Built one about 1986 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe this will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why guessing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
also...stuck at 1 and stuck at 0 faults | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Take it literally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE:RE:![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |