| ??? 03/23/06 00:02 Read: times |
#112835 - Thanks Erik but don't bother... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The engineer is out of town and unavailable to do the work. I have been entrusted to make an educated stab at it. Some day (this week?) the Philips tech and I will make the connection and I will (hopefully) get the answer, if I can't figure it out on my own. In the mean time I am given another day to seek the answer. During a call today he said he would grind the manuals next week when he gets back if I can't do it. In fact, he will anyways because he wants to take advantage of some features in these chips.
Actually, I find it encouraging (maybe even flattering) that he would hand me the job in expectations of my succeeding. Thanks for the help, Ken Jennejohn |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Problem using 87C51Mx as drop-in replace | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still Intel? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a thought | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is going to be tough | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why MX? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem using 87C51Mx as drop-in repla | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I tend to recall that the MX has some ER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I tend to recall that the MX has some E | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if time permits. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Engineers ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very true! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks Erik but don't bother... | 01/01/70 00:00 |