| ??? 03/08/06 01:41 Read: times |
#111574 - Russell responds.... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik, I don't quite know what you expect from me! There's no argument what Andy says is a tautology, but my point is that the point has been made before and claiming 'tautology' is noise to the discussion at hand. Hey, I've even done it myself - but once is funny, twice is starting to get annoying. I share Andy's dislike of bad grammar, apostrophes, spelling etc. Just speak to the guys I work with - I can spot a spelling mistake at 10 paces. In the scope of the discussion regarding the PUT, claiming 'tautology' did nothing to further the discussion, nor does complaining about the use of SMS. There's something in the forum rules about this methinks. A response should address the topic in question, if there is a comment on tautology, apostrophes,SMS etc then add that at the bottom of the message. There's an English TV series screening here at the moment called 'Shameless' which has a character with 'tourette's syndrome'. I can imagine him saying 'tautology!' |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 port to trigger scr from put | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why use a PUT? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tautology. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Philips appnotes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How many times can we say tautology! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's the joke? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No joke | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's excusable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Russell responds.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tautology and SMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tautology etc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What on earth does "pop culture" have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Furthering discussion... | 01/01/70 00:00 |