??? 02/19/06 09:54 Read: times |
#110290 - Saving Power Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
It seems that the smartest thing one could do in this case is to select the slowest input clock frequency that will still allow everything to function. Someone has already touched on that in passing, but it will serve a number of useful purposes, not the least of which is saving power, since this looks as though it should be a battery-operated application. There are two approaches to saving power. 1. Lower the crystal frequency. This is the only option if you must have power on the micro all the time. 2. Process only what you have to then sleep. If you can sleep 90% of the time this will save more power than any amount of lowering the clock frequency. Ian |