| ??? 02/08/06 19:21 Read: times |
#109548 - Yes, But.. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Yes But faster.
I think it is faster and smaller for 8 bits on the '52. the X86 has a shift word by N asm instruction. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Right Filling n x Rightmost Bits with 1' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wrong approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong Approach ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not just |= bits_to_be_added | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| |= bits_to_be_added | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bang on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try an Array | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| |= 2^RightMostBits -1; // sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You are correct about ^ != pow() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| About 25 bytes with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thankyou | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not use a table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| codesize | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, But.. | 01/01/70 00:00 |



