??? 02/07/06 20:14 Read: times |
#109439 - wrong approach Responding to: ???'s previous message |
with least amount of code possible for instance I have a variable 'Mask' that currently holds a value of ....
wrong approach, you have chosen C i.e. chosen clarity over compactness. I would use the |= approach for clarity. Keil is smart enough to leave the parts of a multibyte operand that is not affected alone. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Right Filling n x Rightmost Bits with 1' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wrong approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong Approach ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not just |= bits_to_be_added | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
|= bits_to_be_added | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bang on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try an Array | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
|= 2^RightMostBits -1; // sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You are correct about ^ != pow() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
About 25 bytes with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thankyou | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not use a table? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
codesize | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, But..![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |