| ??? 10/11/11 04:38 Read: times | #184174 - I don't think it's that bad ... Responding to: ???'s previous message | 
| These are just tools, and, to some extent, the serve a purpose.  If you have a body of code that you simply want to move to another region of memory, a disassembled version might serve.  It won't do all the work, but it will, for a simple task like that, help out.
 How much additional help you can extract from a disassembled program is really up to you. No, you can't build a steak, but you can still exercise considerable flexibility, as I once did with a disassembled version of a debug monitor. Frankly, I haven't used a "real" disassembler very often, but the one built into that disassembler, just as in the old MSDOS DEBUG, is quite handy. RE | 
| Topic | Author | Date | 
| Disassemblers are they really that good? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It depends on what you want ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wishes of Birthday | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Disassemblers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think it's that bad ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one good 'disassembler' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That has to be handy! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Shouldn't need a disassembler fo that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Profiler?   | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Only as good as the information they have to work on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I though this tool would teach me something about binary fil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keep in mind what a disassembler is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | 



