| ??? 06/05/10 15:19 Read: times |
#176425 - A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi All,
Even as I posted that last entry, one example occured to me that might be considered a type of "gimme code" if one expands the definition, as suggested above, to include "gimme binary." When I use SiLabs' CP2102 I include their programmers' interface library. I don't decode their routines, I just "Include" them and call them like any other instruction. And they work. Would this count? Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Gimme Code: Is it really worth it? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, in intensive writing situations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unreasonable expectations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Depends | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| As an exercise... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gimme binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did he? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes you'll find out what you need on the go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fundamental flaw | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then "gimme binary and schematics" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LCD code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not the point? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah, I see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| now we know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ha! My wife and children... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two key words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I wouldn't go that far | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code Reuse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A possible counterpoint, or maybe a confirmation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that the reason I need a multi-GHz PC to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an example of really useful 'reusable' code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler libraries | 01/01/70 00:00 |