| ??? 03/24/07 23:22 Read: times |
#135821 - Polyswitches Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Aubrey, polyswitches and the like are thermal devices and as such, are slow to respond. In a short circuit situation, you have a rapid rise of current limited only by the impedance of the source and the circuit. By the time a polyswitch has reacted, the triac is toast. Fuses react quickly, but you need a machanism to quench the arc, so high speed fuses usually have sand to quench this. Using a larger rated triac helps, but doesn't eliminate the problem. In light dimming circuits I used dual thyristors rated at 40A. Apart from being larger and much more expensive, they would withstand a short circuit multiple times whilst only being protected by a standard din-rail circuit breaker. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Protecting a Triac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bigger triac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Snubber, mains filter, varistor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assymetry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Snubber ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Snubber | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Protecting a triac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| switch at zero crossing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Zero crossing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is it back EMF or short circuit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Polyswitches | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thermal properties aside | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why bother ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I vote for overrating too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not "over" just proper | 01/01/70 00:00 |



