| ??? 02/19/07 06:04 Read: times |
#133225 - Right, but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Russell,
What you're saying is true, but it's 115.2kpbs per USB port. High speed USB hubs would interface one CP2102 per USB port. That shouldn't be a problem since 50*115.2 = 5.760 Mbps. My question is more along the lines of what the PC does with 50 of these devices attached to it... Can the PC itself/windows deal with 50 com ports without any glitches? Thanks, D |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| cp2102 and multiple COM ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Depends on many things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| assuming USB spec is obeyed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Assuming CP2102 works at 480mbps! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Right, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 921600 Baud | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 115.2 kbps per USB port... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not know for sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| USBExpress v Virtual COM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mindless unwarranted arbitrary restrictions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what I referred to by "cheap method" was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| End of wrong stick? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing to do with serial-to-USB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not the list | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM9 Limitation Demystified | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| quite | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lazy? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks guys | 01/01/70 00:00 |