| ??? 10/24/06 14:29 Read: times |
#126945 - sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sorry I overlooked the "for testing" in the original post.
I might have not stressed enough the "for personal use only" warning. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| PLCC52 plug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about a socket? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the socket! I need a plug! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you are non-competing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Emulation Technology | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| plugs are pretty expensive | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but so can an 'undetected error' be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here's one option | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bad link and (good) link already given | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, you have to remove the \"<>\" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
GAGHCKKK! another double-post! | 01/01/70 00:00 |