| ??? 09/25/06 19:58 Read: times |
#125037 - better, don't use C at all.. :-) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm still with Jez. The RFCs are full of "be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you receive". Here: be conservative in how you use your tools (editor (-> comments), compiler) and liberal in your expectations of what they produce. C should be treated as a HLL (although it is far from it) also in its "embedded" form. Infinite resources assumed, face it. Don't try timing, tricks with memory/peripherals etc. Do only the "routine" job in C. Then, it doesn't matter, optimized or not. And, if you don't believe in correctness of optimisations - how can you believe in the compiler compiling OK at all? JW (C hater) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| debuging C code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Management solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I kind of hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| False assumption | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to HLL or not to HLL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Things for which an HLL cannot be trusted... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sometimes there's no other way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that was not me, but Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Timing - end of wrong stick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thats not the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better, don't use C at all.. :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| experience and knowledge | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the key word is "manifest" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NASA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| against NASA rules, sorry Andy posted before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pointers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| In the real world | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worse than that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
customers complaining or not ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |